Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

HHS Logo Eagle IconU.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Child Welfare

Reports

Displaying 151 - 160 of 254. 10 per page. Page 16.

Advanced Search

Neighborhoods and Health: Building Evidence for Local Policy

Contents Site-Specific Analyses Cross-Site Analysis: The Changing Urban Context Cross-Site Analysis: Health Trends and Study Hypotheses Conclusions  

National Study of Child Protective Services Systems and Reform Efforts: Site Visits Report

National Study of Child Protective Services Systems and Reform Efforts. Findings on Local CPS Practices

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Children's Bureau Administration on Children, Youth and Families Administration for Children and Families andOffice of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation

National Study of Child Protective Services Systems and Reform Efforts: Review of State CPS Policy - Appendix C

Trends in the Well-Being of America's Children and Youth, 2003

National Study of Child Protective Services Systems and Reform Efforts. Review of State CPS Policy

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluationand Administration for Children and Families Administration on Children, Youth and Families Children's Bureau

Privatization in Practice: Case Studies of Contracting for TANF Case Management

The privatization of welfare services has increased significantly and expanded into new services since passage of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) gave states additional flexibility to design and operate their Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) programs.

Privatization in Practice: Case Studies of Contracting for TANF Case Management

By: Sheena McConnell, Andrew Burwick, Irma Perez-Johnson, and Pamela Winston March 2003

Interim Evaluation Report: Congressionally Mandated Evaluation of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program

This report draws primarily on findings from case studies in six of the ten states selected for the evaluation, whose early experiences implementing SCHIP have been examined closely: California, Colorado, Louisiana, Missouri, New York, and Texas. Case study respondents interviewed in the case studies included state officials, advocates, plan staff, and providers.

State Experience and Perspectives on Reducing Out-of-Wedlock Births

State Experience and Perspectives on Reducing Out-of-Wedlock Births   Final Report Prepared for: Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation Department of Health and Human Services Prepared by: The Lewin Group, Inc. Mark W. Nowak Michael E. Fishman Mary E. Farrell February 2003