This report examines the implementation of TANF sanctions in three states, looking at the ways that case managers used sanctions to promote compliance with work requirements. They found that case managers often exercised discretion in deciding whether and when to initiate a sanction, especially when a client partially met participation requirements. Case manager choices, office procedures and philosophies, client behavior, and case manager workload all affected whether a client would be sanctioned. In general, case managers did not consider it their responsibility to conduct outreach to sanctioned clients; nonetheless, most recipients who were subject to a partial sanction did not proceed to a full-family sanction, and many fully sanctioned recipients returned to welfare after exit. Case managers agreed that the prospect of sanctions was a useful tool to encourage recipients to participate in work activities.
Use of TANF Work-Oriented Sanctions in Illinois, New Jersey, and South Carolina: Final Report
Publication Date
Files
Document
report.pdf (pdf, 1.18 MB)
Populations
Children
Location- & Geography-Based Data
State Data
Program
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)